Overall score
Acacia Hills
39.9/100
Sheffield
44.8/100
Acacia Hills for retirees and families; Sheffield for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Acacia Hills
39.9/100
Sheffield
44.8/100
Crime rate
Acacia Hills
3188.6 / 1k
Sheffield
1450.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Acacia Hills
1
Sheffield
70
Population
Acacia Hills
729
Sheffield
1,602
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acacia Hills | Sheffield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.9/100 | 44.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 64.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 3188.6 / 1k | 1450.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 57.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 70 |
| Population | 729 | 1,602 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 1/10 |
Acacia Hills reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Sheffield is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Acacia Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Sheffield keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Acacia Hills is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Sheffield answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Acacia Hills generally means more mid-market housing value, while Sheffield leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees and investors may find Acacia Hills the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Sheffield.