Overall score
Acacia Hills
39.9/100
South Spreyton
37.8/100
Acacia Hills leads on 4 of 4 comparable categories.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Acacia Hills
39.9/100
South Spreyton
37.8/100
Crime rate
Acacia Hills
3188.6 / 1k
South Spreyton
4032.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Acacia Hills
1
South Spreyton
0
Population
Acacia Hills
729
South Spreyton
576
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acacia Hills | South Spreyton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.9/100 | 37.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 3188.6 / 1k | 4032.9 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 0 |
| Population | 729 | 576 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Acacia Hills is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and South Spreyton is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Acacia Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while South Spreyton keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Acacia Hills pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas South Spreyton is the better pick for a country-town feel and improving crime trends. On housing, Acacia Hills sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in South Spreyton.
Neither suburb has a sharp audience split here. The better choice between Acacia Hills and South Spreyton comes down to which lifestyle trade-offs matter most to you.