Overall score
Acacia Hills
39.9/100
Wilmot
23.1/100
Acacia Hills for retirees and families; Wilmot for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Acacia Hills
39.9/100
Wilmot
23.1/100
Crime rate
Acacia Hills
3188.6 / 1k
Wilmot
8092.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Acacia Hills
1
Wilmot
4
Population
Acacia Hills
729
Wilmot
287
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acacia Hills | Wilmot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.9/100 | 23.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 3188.6 / 1k | 8092.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 4 |
| Population | 729 | 287 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 1/10 |
Acacia Hills is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Wilmot is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Acacia Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Wilmot keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Acacia Hills pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Wilmot is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Acacia Hills sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Wilmot.
Acacia Hills suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Wilmot is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.