Overall score
Acton
39.3/100
Parklands
51.2/100
Acton vs Parklands, TAS Suburb Comparison
Acton for investment; Parklands for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ActonParklands
Crime rate
Acton
50.0 / 1k
Parklands
50.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Acton
19
Parklands
78
Population
Acton
1,377
Parklands
865
Metric leadActon 3Parklands 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acton | Parklands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.3/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 75.5/100 | 66.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.0 / 1k | 50.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 12 |
| Walkability | 17.0/100 | 20.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 19 | 78 |
| Green cover | 3.9% | 16.0% |
| Population | 1,377 | 865 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Acton reads as a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Parklands is a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone. Where Parklands is shaped by the coast, Acton offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Acton tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and a larger local community, while Parklands stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Acton generally means more approachable housing costs, while Parklands leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Choose Acton if you are weighing investors; lean toward Parklands for retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.