Overall score
Adelaide Park
40.6/100
Barmaryee
41.0/100
Adelaide Park vs Barmaryee, QLD Suburb Comparison
Adelaide Park for schools; Barmaryee for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Adelaide ParkBarmaryee
Crime rate
Adelaide Park
62.5 / 1k
Barmaryee
63.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Adelaide Park
0
Barmaryee
8
Population
Adelaide Park
449
Barmaryee
925
Metric leadAdelaide Park 2Barmaryee 52 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesBarmaryee
- Best for best valueBarmaryee
- Best for best schoolsAdelaide Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Adelaide Park | Barmaryee |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.6/100 | 41.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.3/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 62.5 / 1k | 63.5 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 18.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 8 |
| Green cover | 34.5% | 12.8% |
| Population | 449 | 925 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Adelaide Park is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Barmaryee is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Adelaide Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Barmaryee answers with housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability. Adelaide Park generally means more mid-market housing value, while Barmaryee leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Barmaryee, while Adelaide Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.