Aitkenvale vs Currajong, QLD Suburb Comparison

Aitkenvale for families and value; Currajong for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AitkenvaleCurrajong

Overall score

Aitkenvale

39.9/100

Currajong

41.4/100

Crime rate

Aitkenvale

183.8 / 1k

Currajong

198.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aitkenvale

144

Currajong

70

Population

Aitkenvale

4,797

Currajong

2,490

Metric leadAitkenvale 7Currajong 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAitkenvaleCurrajong
Overall score39.9/10041.4/100
Housing (desirability)55.6/10059.9/100
Crime rate183.8 / 1k198.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools117
Weather (desirability)19.8/10019.8/100
Parks & reserves64
Walkability60.5/10048.0/100
Nearby amenities14470
Green cover13.6%9.2%
Population4,7972,490
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Aitkenvale reads as a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Currajong is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Aitkenvale tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Currajong stands out for a hub for schools and preschools, plus relatively affordable housing.

Families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Aitkenvale the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Currajong.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons