Overall score
Albert Park
68.6/100
Port Melbourne
67.9/100
Albert Park for families and beach lifestyle; Port Melbourne for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Albert Park
68.6/100
Port Melbourne
67.9/100
Crime rate
Albert Park
131.0 / 1k
Port Melbourne
158.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Albert Park
401
Port Melbourne
496
Population
Albert Park
6,044
Port Melbourne
17,633
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Albert Park | Port Melbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 68.6/100 | 67.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 27.3/100 | 36.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 131.0 / 1k | 158.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 29 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 98 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 401 | 496 |
| Planning activity | 207 | 306 |
| Population | 6,044 | 17,633 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Albert Park reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Port Melbourne is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.
On the data, Albert Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Port Melbourne answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Albert Park suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Port Melbourne is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.