Albert Park vs Balaclava, VIC suburb comparison

Albert Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Albert ParkBalaclava

Overall score

Albert Park

68.6/100

Balaclava

48.6/100

Crime rate

Albert Park

131.0 / 1k

Balaclava

141.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Albert Park

401

Balaclava

76

Population

Albert Park

6,044

Balaclava

5,392

Metric leadAlbert Park 7Balaclava 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAlbert ParkBalaclava
Overall score68.6/10048.6/100
Housing (desirability)27.3/10021.6/100
Crime rate131.0 / 1k141.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1418
Parks & reserves92
Public transport stops2920
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities40176
Planning activity20783
Population6,0445,392
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Albert Park is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Balaclava is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Albert Park leans into coastal living, while Balaclava feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Albert Park is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Balaclava answers with schools and education options and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Albert Park, while Balaclava remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons