Balaclava vs Middle Park, VIC suburb comparison

Middle Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BalaclavaMiddle Park

Overall score

Balaclava

48.6/100

Middle Park

61.3/100

Crime rate

Balaclava

141.8 / 1k

Middle Park

78.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Balaclava

76

Middle Park

110

Population

Balaclava

5,392

Middle Park

4,000

Metric leadBalaclava 4Middle Park 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBalaclavaMiddle Park
Overall score48.6/10061.3/100
Housing (desirability)21.6/10021.6/100
Crime rate141.8 / 1k78.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1810
Parks & reserves23
Public transport stops2023
Walkability100.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities76110
Planning activity83122
Population5,3924,000
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Balaclava is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Middle Park is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Middle Park leans into coastal living, while Balaclava feels more inland and suburban in character.

Balaclava tends to lead on schools and education options and walkability, while Middle Park stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Middle Park, while Balaclava remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons