Balaclava vs South Melbourne, VIC suburb comparison

South Melbourne for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BalaclavaSouth Melbourne

Overall score

Balaclava

48.6/100

South Melbourne

68.8/100

Crime rate

Balaclava

141.8 / 1k

South Melbourne

305.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Balaclava

76

South Melbourne

559

Population

Balaclava

5,392

South Melbourne

11,548

Metric leadBalaclava 4South Melbourne 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBalaclavaSouth Melbourne
Overall score48.6/10068.8/100
Housing (desirability)21.6/1007.9/100
Crime rate141.8 / 1k305.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1812
Parks & reserves210
Public transport stops2045
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities76559
Planning activity83247
Population5,39211,548
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Balaclava is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while South Melbourne is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Balaclava is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; South Melbourne answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer South Melbourne, while Balaclava remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons