Alfred Cove vs Mount Pleasant, WA suburb comparison

Alfred Cove for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Alfred CoveMount Pleasant

Overall score

Alfred Cove

56.1/100

Mount Pleasant

58.6/100

Crime rate

Alfred Cove

4241.8 / 1k

Mount Pleasant

1577.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Alfred Cove

30

Mount Pleasant

94

Population

Alfred Cove

2,830

Mount Pleasant

7,456

Metric leadAlfred Cove 2Mount Pleasant 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAlfred CoveMount Pleasant
Overall score56.1/10058.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10011.3/100
Crime rate4241.8 / 1k1577.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools87
Parks & reserves27
Public transport stops1334
Walkability25.5/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities3094
Population2,8307,456
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Alfred Cove is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city, and Mount Pleasant is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Pleasant sits among greener hillside streets, while Alfred Cove keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Alfred Cove is stronger for housing affordability; Mount Pleasant answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Alfred Cove the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Pleasant.

Related comparisons