Overall score
Bateman
59.7/100
Mount Pleasant
58.6/100
Bateman vs Mount Pleasant, WA suburb comparison
Bateman for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BatemanMount Pleasant
Crime rate
Bateman
3143.5 / 1k
Mount Pleasant
1577.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bateman
61
Mount Pleasant
94
Population
Bateman
3,832
Mount Pleasant
7,456
Metric leadBateman 3Mount Pleasant 43 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bateman | Mount Pleasant |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.7/100 | 58.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 11.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 3143.5 / 1k | 1577.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 34 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 61 | 94 |
| Population | 3,832 | 7,456 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Bateman reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Mount Pleasant is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Pleasant sits among greener hillside streets, while Bateman keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Bateman is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Mount Pleasant answers with a quieter safety profile and walkability.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Bateman, while Mount Pleasant remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.