Bateman vs Leeming, WA Suburb Comparison

Bateman for families and schools; Leeming for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BatemanLeeming

Overall score

Bateman

50.0/100

Leeming

64.5/100

Crime rate

Bateman

53.7 / 1k

Leeming

53.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bateman

82

Leeming

227

Population

Bateman

3,832

Leeming

10,883

Metric leadBateman 0Leeming 84 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBatemanLeeming
Overall score50.0/10064.5/100
Housing (desirability)53.2/10058.3/100
Crime rate53.7 / 1k53.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools77
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves719
Public transport stops3777
Walkability34.0/10086.0/100
Nearby amenities82227
Green cover7.5%17.4%
Population3,83210,883
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Bateman is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Leeming is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Bateman is stronger for excellent public transport, plus a hub for schools and preschools; Leeming answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Bateman the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Leeming.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons