Bateman vs Kardinya, WA Suburb Comparison

Bateman for families and investment; Kardinya for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BatemanKardinya

Overall score

Bateman

50.0/100

Kardinya

54.1/100

Crime rate

Bateman

53.7 / 1k

Kardinya

53.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bateman

82

Kardinya

156

Population

Bateman

3,832

Kardinya

9,137

Metric leadBateman 1Kardinya 83 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBatemanKardinya
Overall score50.0/10054.1/100
Housing (desirability)53.2/10069.2/100
Crime rate53.7 / 1k53.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools77
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves78
Public transport stops3743
Walkability34.0/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities82156
Green cover7.5%9.9%
Population3,8329,137
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Bateman is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Kardinya is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Bateman pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Kardinya is the better pick for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose Bateman if you are weighing retirees, families, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Kardinya for value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons