Kardinya vs Murdoch, WA Suburb Comparison

Kardinya for families and investment; Murdoch for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KardinyaMurdoch

Overall score

Kardinya

54.1/100

Murdoch

59.5/100

Crime rate

Kardinya

55.3 / 1k

Murdoch

55.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kardinya

156

Murdoch

377

Population

Kardinya

9,137

Murdoch

3,352

Metric leadKardinya 4Murdoch 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKardinyaMurdoch
Overall score54.1/10059.5/100
Housing (desirability)69.2/10026.2/100
Crime rate55.3 / 1k55.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools78
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves85
Public transport stops4347
Walkability84.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities156377
Green cover9.9%18.1%
Population9,1373,352
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Kardinya reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Murdoch is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Kardinya tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and overall desirability, while Murdoch stands out for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kardinya, while Murdoch remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons