Overall score
Alligator Creek
30.6/100
Stuart
28.7/100
Stuart for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Alligator Creek
30.6/100
Stuart
28.7/100
Crime rate
Alligator Creek
127.7 / 1k
Stuart
111.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Alligator Creek
1
Stuart
5
Population
Alligator Creek
1,550
Stuart
1,576
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Alligator Creek | Stuart |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.6/100 | 28.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.0/100 | 21.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 127.7 / 1k | 111.2 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 7.3/100 | 19.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 5 |
| Green cover | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,550 | 1,576 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Alligator Creek reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Stuart is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Alligator Creek is stronger for overall desirability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Stuart answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Alligator Creek sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Stuart.
Retirees and families may find Alligator Creek the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Stuart.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.