Alstonville vs Uralba, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Alstonville | Uralba |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 71.2/100 | 31.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 79.8/100 | 79.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.6 / 1k | 41.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 215 | 21 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 158 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 17 | 1 |
| Population | 5,912 | 266 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesUralba
- Best for familiesAlstonville
- Best for investmentAlstonville
- Best for best valueAlstonville
- Best for best schoolsAlstonville
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Alstonville is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Uralba is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
On the data, Alstonville is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Uralba answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Families and investors may find Alstonville the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Uralba.