Altona North vs South Kingsville, VIC Suburb Comparison

Altona North for retirees and value; South Kingsville for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Altona NorthSouth Kingsville

Overall score

Altona North

47.6/100

South Kingsville

55.2/100

Crime rate

Altona North

99.6 / 1k

South Kingsville

44.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Altona North

245

South Kingsville

32

Population

Altona North

12,962

South Kingsville

2,156

Metric leadAltona North 5South Kingsville 71 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAltona NorthSouth Kingsville
Overall score47.6/10055.2/100
Housing (desirability)45.9/10055.2/100
Crime rate99.6 / 1k44.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves181
Public transport stops10716
Walkability100.0/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities24532
Planning activity29132
Green cover3.6%4.6%
Population12,9622,156
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Altona North is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and South Kingsville is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Altona North sits in a middle-ring position, whereas South Kingsville is closer to the city centre.

Altona North pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas South Kingsville is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

Choose Altona North if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward South Kingsville for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons