Overall score
Annerley
59.5/100
Yeerongpilly
65.5/100
Annerley vs Yeerongpilly, QLD Suburb Comparison
Annerley for retirees and schools; Yeerongpilly for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AnnerleyYeerongpilly
Crime rate
Annerley
101.9 / 1k
Yeerongpilly
78.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Annerley
525
Yeerongpilly
143
Population
Annerley
11,891
Yeerongpilly
2,033
Metric leadAnnerley 7Yeerongpilly 41 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesAnnerley
- Best for familiesYeerongpilly
- Best for investmentYeerongpilly
- Best for best schoolsAnnerley
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Annerley | Yeerongpilly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.5/100 | 65.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 69.1/100 | 55.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 101.9 / 1k | 78.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 26 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 525 | 143 |
| Green cover | 5.1% | 6.7% |
| Population | 11,891 | 2,033 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Annerley is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Yeerongpilly is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Annerley pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Yeerongpilly is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Choose Annerley if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Yeerongpilly for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.