Overall score
Anstead
48.7/100
Mount Crosby
44.6/100
Anstead for retirees and families; Mount Crosby for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Anstead
48.7/100
Mount Crosby
44.6/100
Crime rate
Anstead
7.7 / 1k
Mount Crosby
34.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Anstead
19
Mount Crosby
22
Population
Anstead
1,522
Mount Crosby
1,860
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Anstead | Mount Crosby |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.7/100 | 44.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 7.7 / 1k | 34.8 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 5 |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 19 | 22 |
| Population | 1,522 | 1,860 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Anstead reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Mount Crosby is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Crosby sits among greener hillside streets, while Anstead keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Anstead pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Mount Crosby is the better pick for parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Anstead if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Crosby for households prioritising schools.