Anstead vs Mount Crosby, QLD suburb comparison

Anstead for retirees and families; Mount Crosby for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AnsteadMount Crosby

Overall score

Anstead

48.7/100

Mount Crosby

44.6/100

Crime rate

Anstead

7.7 / 1k

Mount Crosby

34.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Anstead

19

Mount Crosby

22

Population

Anstead

1,522

Mount Crosby

1,860

Metric leadAnstead 3Mount Crosby 32 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAnsteadMount Crosby
Overall score48.7/10044.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate7.7 / 1k34.8 / 1k
Parks & reserves25
Walkability2.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1922
Population1,5221,860
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Anstead reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Mount Crosby is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Crosby sits among greener hillside streets, while Anstead keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Anstead pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Mount Crosby is the better pick for parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Anstead if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Crosby for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons