Overall score
Ardmona
25.8/100
Tatura
48.3/100
Tatura for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ardmona
25.8/100
Tatura
48.3/100
Crime rate
Ardmona
119.7 / 1k
Tatura
70.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ardmona
4
Tatura
177
Population
Ardmona
497
Tatura
4,955
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ardmona | Tatura |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 25.8/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 32.8/100 | 58.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 119.7 / 1k | 70.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 18.6/100 | 18.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 177 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 69 |
| Green cover | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Population | 497 | 4,955 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Ardmona is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Tatura is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Ardmona tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook, while Tatura stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tatura, while Ardmona remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.