Ardmona vs Tatura, VIC suburb comparison

Tatura for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArdmonaTatura

Overall score

Ardmona

25.3/100

Tatura

64.0/100

Crime rate

Ardmona

119.7 / 1k

Tatura

58.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ardmona

4

Tatura

176

Population

Ardmona

497

Tatura

4,955

Metric leadArdmona 1Tatura 9across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArdmonaTatura
Overall score25.3/10064.0/100
Housing (desirability)51.5/10074.2/100
Crime rate119.7 / 1k58.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Parks & reserves17
Public transport stops2
Walkability0.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities4176
Planning activity1169
Population4974,955
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ardmona is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Tatura is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Ardmona tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Tatura stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Tatura, while Ardmona remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons