Ardmona vs Tatura, VIC Suburb Comparison

Tatura for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArdmonaTatura

Overall score

Ardmona

25.8/100

Tatura

48.3/100

Crime rate

Ardmona

119.7 / 1k

Tatura

70.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ardmona

4

Tatura

177

Population

Ardmona

497

Tatura

4,955

Metric leadArdmona 1Tatura 101 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArdmonaTatura
Overall score25.8/10048.3/100
Housing (desirability)32.8/10058.0/100
Crime rate119.7 / 1k70.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)18.6/10018.6/100
Parks & reserves17
Public transport stops—2
Walkability0.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities4177
Planning activity1169
Green cover0.2%0.4%
Population4974,955
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ardmona is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Tatura is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Ardmona tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook, while Tatura stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tatura, while Ardmona remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons