Arrawarra Headland vs Red Rock, NSW Suburb Comparison

Arrawarra Headland for retirees and families; Red Rock for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Arrawarra HeadlandRed Rock

Overall score

Arrawarra Headland

48.0/100

Red Rock

45.0/100

Crime rate

Arrawarra Headland

64.8 / 1k

Red Rock

65.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arrawarra Headland

18

Red Rock

9

Population

Arrawarra Headland

615

Red Rock

412

Metric leadArrawarra Headland 7Red Rock 41 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArrawarra HeadlandRed Rock
Overall score48.0/10045.0/100
Housing (desirability)38.3/10044.2/100
Crime rate64.8 / 1k65.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops1430
Walkability21.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities189
Planning activity585
Green cover41.0%5.1%
Population615412
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Arrawarra Headland is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm, and Red Rock is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Where Arrawarra Headland is shaped by the coast, Red Rock offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Arrawarra Headland pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, whereas Red Rock is the better pick for public transport access, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Arrawarra Headland, while Red Rock remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons