Ascot vs Kalinga, QLD suburb comparison

Kalinga for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AscotKalinga

Overall score

Ascot

60.8/100

Kalinga

59.5/100

Crime rate

Ascot

52.8 / 1k

Kalinga

51.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ascot

103

Kalinga

106

Population

Ascot

6,531

Kalinga

2,144

Metric leadAscot 4Kalinga 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAscotKalinga
Overall score60.8/10059.5/100
Housing (desirability)14.1/10076.0/100
Crime rate52.8 / 1k51.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools1014
Parks & reserves45
Public transport stops4519
Walkability69.0/10030.5/100
Nearby amenities103106
Population6,5312,144
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Ascot is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Kalinga is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.

Ascot tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Kalinga stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Ascot the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kalinga.

Related comparisons