Overall score
Gordon Park
56.4/100
Kalinga
59.8/100
Kalinga for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gordon Park
56.4/100
Kalinga
59.8/100
Crime rate
Gordon Park
42.6 / 1k
Kalinga
48.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gordon Park
48
Kalinga
106
Population
Gordon Park
4,390
Kalinga
2,144
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gordon Park | Kalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.4/100 | 59.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.6 / 1k | 48.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 14 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 19 |
| Walkability | 33.5/100 | 30.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 48 | 106 |
| Population | 4,390 | 2,144 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Gordon Park reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Kalinga is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.
Gordon Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Kalinga is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.
On balance, families are more likely to prefer Kalinga, while Gordon Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.