Clayfield vs Gordon Park, QLD Suburb Comparison

Clayfield for retirees; Gordon Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClayfieldGordon Park

Overall score

Clayfield

62.5/100

Gordon Park

56.2/100

Crime rate

Clayfield

48.2 / 1k

Gordon Park

68.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clayfield

207

Gordon Park

53

Population

Clayfield

10,897

Gordon Park

4,390

Metric leadClayfield 7Gordon Park 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClayfieldGordon Park
Overall score62.5/10056.2/100
Housing (desirability)60.5/10077.5/100
Crime rate48.2 / 1k68.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1512
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops5317
Walkability100.0/10033.5/100
Nearby amenities20753
Green cover1.6%2.7%
Population10,8974,390
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Clayfield is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Gordon Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Clayfield pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access, whereas Gordon Park is the better pick for housing affordability.

Choose Clayfield if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Gordon Park for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons