Overall score
Clayfield
62.5/100
Gordon Park
56.2/100
Clayfield for retirees; Gordon Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clayfield
62.5/100
Gordon Park
56.2/100
Crime rate
Clayfield
48.2 / 1k
Gordon Park
68.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clayfield
207
Gordon Park
53
Population
Clayfield
10,897
Gordon Park
4,390
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clayfield | Gordon Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.5/100 | 56.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 77.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.2 / 1k | 68.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 12 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 53 | 17 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 207 | 53 |
| Green cover | 1.6% | 2.7% |
| Population | 10,897 | 4,390 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Clayfield is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Gordon Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Clayfield pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access, whereas Gordon Park is the better pick for housing affordability.
Choose Clayfield if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Gordon Park for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.