Ascot vs Bagshot, VIC suburb comparison

Ascot for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AscotBagshot

Overall score

Ascot

40.0/100

Bagshot

30.8/100

Crime rate

Ascot

Bagshot

107.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ascot

24

Bagshot

2

Population

Ascot

2,571

Bagshot

355

Metric leadAscot 5Bagshot 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAscotBagshot
Overall score40.0/10030.8/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10074.6/100
Crime rate107.1 / 1k
Parks & reserves31
Public transport stops34
Walkability4.5/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities242
Planning activity3010
Population2,571355
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ascot is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Bagshot is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Ascot is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Bagshot answers with public transport access and walkability.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ascot, while Bagshot remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons