Overall score
Bagshot
35.8/100
Huntly
44.8/100
Bagshot vs Huntly, VIC Suburb Comparison
Bagshot for schools; Huntly for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BagshotHuntly
Crime rate
Bagshot
118.1 / 1k
Huntly
72.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bagshot
2
Huntly
46
Population
Bagshot
355
Huntly
3,585
Metric leadBagshot 1Huntly 92 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bagshot | Huntly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.8/100 | 44.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.4/100 | 53.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 118.1 / 1k | 72.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 21 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 46 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 87 |
| Green cover | 1.5% | 10.6% |
| Population | 355 | 3,585 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bagshot is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Huntly is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Bagshot tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook, while Huntly stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. Bagshot generally means more mid-market housing value, while Huntly leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Huntly, while Bagshot remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.