Overall score
Ascot Park
45.4/100
Oaklands Park
53.4/100
Ascot Park for value; Oaklands Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ascot Park
45.4/100
Oaklands Park
53.4/100
Crime rate
Ascot Park
66.5 / 1k
Oaklands Park
277.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ascot Park
65
Oaklands Park
223
Population
Ascot Park
3,588
Oaklands Park
3,948
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ascot Park | Oaklands Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.0/100 | 24.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 66.5 / 1k | 277.6 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 25 |
| Walkability | 55.5/100 | 85.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 65 | 223 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 41 |
| Population | 3,588 | 3,948 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Ascot Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Oaklands Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Ascot Park sits closer to the city centre, whereas Oaklands Park is in a middle-ring position.
Ascot Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Oaklands Park stands out for public transport access and walkability. Ascot Park generally means more sought-after housing, while Oaklands Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Ascot Park suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Oaklands Park is the stronger match for families and investors.