Ascot Park vs Oaklands Park, SA Suburb Comparison

Ascot Park for investment and value; Oaklands Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Ascot ParkOaklands Park

Overall score

Ascot Park

43.7/100

Oaklands Park

42.6/100

Crime rate

Ascot Park

51.2 / 1k

Oaklands Park

276.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ascot Park

67

Oaklands Park

225

Population

Ascot Park

3,588

Oaklands Park

3,948

Metric leadAscot Park 5Oaklands Park 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAscot ParkOaklands Park
Overall score43.7/10042.6/100
Housing (desirability)69.1/10052.5/100
Crime rate51.2 / 1k276.7 / 1k
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1525
Walkability55.5/10085.0/100
Nearby amenities67225
Planning activity2556
Green cover1.0%10.8%
Population3,5883,948
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Ascot Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Oaklands Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Ascot Park sits closer to the city centre, whereas Oaklands Park is in a middle-ring position.

Ascot Park tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while Oaklands Park stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Ascot Park suits retirees and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Oaklands Park is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons