Ascot vs Rivervale, WA suburb comparison

Ascot for retirees and investment; Rivervale for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AscotRivervale

Overall score

Ascot

42.6/100

Rivervale

52.7/100

Crime rate

Ascot

4093.9 / 1k

Rivervale

1094.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ascot

45

Rivervale

80

Population

Ascot

3,095

Rivervale

10,897

Metric leadAscot 2Rivervale 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAscotRivervale
Overall score42.6/10052.7/100
Housing (desirability)10.9/1005.4/100
Crime rate4093.9 / 1k1094.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools310
Parks & reserves47
Public transport stops1434
Walkability39.0/10069.0/100
Nearby amenities4580
Population3,09510,897
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Ascot reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Rivervale is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Ascot tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Rivervale stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Ascot suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Rivervale is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons