Ascot vs Cloverdale, WA suburb comparison

Ascot for retirees; Cloverdale for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AscotCloverdale

Overall score

Ascot

42.6/100

Cloverdale

57.4/100

Crime rate

Ascot

4093.9 / 1k

Cloverdale

1395.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ascot

45

Cloverdale

174

Population

Ascot

3,095

Cloverdale

8,864

Metric leadAscot 1Cloverdale 9across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAscotCloverdale
Overall score42.6/10057.4/100
Housing (desirability)10.9/10012.4/100
Crime rate4093.9 / 1k1395.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools37
Parks & reserves45
Public transport stops1462
Walkability39.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities45174
Population3,0958,864
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/104/10

Comparison summary

Ascot reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Cloverdale is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Ascot tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Cloverdale stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Ascot suits retirees more clearly, whereas Cloverdale is the stronger match for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons