Ashfield vs Petersham, NSW suburb comparison

Ashfield for value; Petersham for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AshfieldPetersham

Overall score

Ashfield

68.7/100

Petersham

63.3/100

Crime rate

Ashfield

51.8 / 1k

Petersham

54.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ashfield

654

Petersham

242

Population

Ashfield

23,012

Petersham

8,200

Metric leadAshfield 8Petersham 21 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAshfieldPetersham
Overall score68.7/10063.3/100
Housing (desirability)11.9/1009.8/100
Crime rate51.8 / 1k54.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1830
Parks & reserves194
Public transport stops18961
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities654242
Planning activity4647
Population23,0128,200
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ashfield is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Petersham is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Ashfield tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Petersham stands out for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Ashfield suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Petersham is the stronger match for families and investors.

Related comparisons

Ashfield vs Petersham, NSW suburb comparison | Suburb Guide