Haberfield vs Petersham, NSW Suburb Comparison

Haberfield for retirees and families; Petersham for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HaberfieldPetersham

Overall score

Haberfield

70.6/100

Petersham

60.5/100

Crime rate

Haberfield

27.8 / 1k

Petersham

54.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Haberfield

318

Petersham

254

Population

Haberfield

6,480

Petersham

8,200

Metric leadHaberfield 7Petersham 33 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHaberfieldPetersham
Overall score70.6/10060.5/100
Housing (desirability)55.5/10051.9/100
Crime rate27.8 / 1k54.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools2030
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves74
Public transport stops7061
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities318254
Planning activity7856
Green cover7.6%4.3%
Population6,4808,200
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Haberfield is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Petersham is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Haberfield is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Petersham answers with schools and education options, a calmer planning outlook, and a larger local community.

Haberfield suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Petersham is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons