Overall score
Haberfield
70.6/100
Lilyfield
60.4/100
Haberfield vs Lilyfield, NSW Suburb Comparison
Haberfield for retirees and investment; Lilyfield for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
HaberfieldLilyfield
Crime rate
Haberfield
27.8 / 1k
Lilyfield
51.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Haberfield
318
Lilyfield
163
Population
Haberfield
6,480
Lilyfield
7,641
Metric leadHaberfield 8Lilyfield 32 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesHaberfield
- Best for investmentHaberfield
- Best for best valueHaberfield
- Best for best schoolsLilyfield
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Haberfield | Lilyfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 70.6/100 | 60.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.5/100 | 46.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.8 / 1k | 51.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 20 | 15 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 70 | 39 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 71.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 318 | 163 |
| Planning activity | 78 | 46 |
| Green cover | 7.6% | 34.4% |
| Population | 6,480 | 7,641 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Haberfield is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Lilyfield is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Haberfield pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, whereas Lilyfield is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook and a larger local community.
Choose Haberfield if you are weighing retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Lilyfield for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.