Overall score
Auburn
48.8/100
Riverton
35.7/100
Auburn for retirees and families; Riverton for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Auburn
48.8/100
Riverton
35.7/100
Crime rate
Auburn
26.0 / 1k
Riverton
27.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Auburn
31
Riverton
10
Population
Auburn
668
Riverton
1,029
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Auburn | Riverton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.8/100 | 35.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.4/100 | 69.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.0 / 1k | 27.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 28.8/100 | 28.8/100 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 4 |
| Walkability | 43.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 31 | 10 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 24 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| Population | 668 | 1,029 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Auburn is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Riverton is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Auburn pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Riverton is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access. Auburn generally means more mid-market housing value, while Riverton leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees may find Auburn the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Riverton.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.