Auldana vs Stonyfell, SA Suburb Comparison

Auldana for families and investment; Stonyfell for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AuldanaStonyfell

Overall score

Auldana

53.4/100

Stonyfell

60.3/100

Crime rate

Auldana

11.5 / 1k

Stonyfell

14.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Auldana

7

Stonyfell

32

Population

Auldana

629

Stonyfell

1,266

Metric leadAuldana 3Stonyfell 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAuldanaStonyfell
Overall score53.4/10060.3/100
Housing (desirability)58.8/10056.7/100
Crime rate11.5 / 1k14.7 / 1k
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops—3
Walkability0.0/1008.5/100
Nearby amenities732
Planning activity529
Green cover7.2%21.0%
Population6291,266
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Auldana is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, while Stonyfell is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Auldana tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook, while Stonyfell stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Retirees may find Auldana the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Stonyfell.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons