Austinville vs Mudgeeraba, QLD Suburb Comparison

Mudgeeraba for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AustinvilleMudgeeraba

Overall score

Austinville

46.4/100

Mudgeeraba

50.2/100

Crime rate

Austinville

39.4 / 1k

Mudgeeraba

39.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Austinville

5

Mudgeeraba

19

Population

Austinville

403

Mudgeeraba

14,578

Metric leadAustinville 1Mudgeeraba 81 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAustinvilleMudgeeraba
Overall score46.4/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)36.6/10050.0/100
Crime rate39.4 / 1k39.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves125
Public transport stops—33
Walkability0.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities519
Green cover0.0%10.2%
Population40314,578
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Austinville is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Mudgeeraba is a sought-after metro established suburb where housing reflects strong local demand. Austinville sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Mudgeeraba is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Austinville is stronger for a country-town feel and an emerging neighbourhood; Mudgeeraba answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. On housing, Austinville sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Mudgeeraba.

On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mudgeeraba, while Austinville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons