Avalon vs Norlane, VIC suburb comparison

Avalon for retirees and families; Norlane for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AvalonNorlane

Overall score

Avalon

28.8/100

Norlane

62.3/100

Crime rate

Avalon

329.7 / 1k

Norlane

283.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Avalon

0

Norlane

239

Population

Avalon

255

Norlane

8,682

Metric leadAvalon 2Norlane 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAvalonNorlane
Overall score28.8/10062.3/100
Housing (desirability)32.9/10056.0/100
Crime rate329.7 / 1k283.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves19
Public transport stops443
Walkability6.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities0239
Planning activity5156
Population2558,682
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Avalon is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Norlane is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Where Avalon is shaped by the coast, Norlane offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Avalon pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Norlane is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves. Avalon generally means more mid-market housing value, while Norlane leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and families may find Avalon the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Norlane.

Related comparisons