Overall score
Balaclava
50.8/100
Middle Park
62.5/100
Balaclava for investment; Middle Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Balaclava
50.8/100
Middle Park
62.5/100
Crime rate
Balaclava
141.8 / 1k
Middle Park
78.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Balaclava
81
Middle Park
118
Population
Balaclava
5,392
Middle Park
4,000
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Balaclava | Middle Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.8/100 | 62.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.8/100 | 59.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 141.8 / 1k | 78.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 18 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 20 | 23 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 81 | 118 |
| Planning activity | 83 | 122 |
| Green cover | 1.4% | 0.7% |
| Population | 5,392 | 4,000 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Balaclava is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Middle Park is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Middle Park leans into coastal living, while Balaclava feels more inland and suburban in character.
Balaclava tends to lead on schools and education options, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook, while Middle Park stands out for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Middle Park, while Balaclava remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.