Overall score
Ballan
52.0/100
Mount Egerton
49.3/100
Ballan for families and investment; Mount Egerton for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ballan
52.0/100
Mount Egerton
49.3/100
Crime rate
Ballan
87.1 / 1k
Mount Egerton
41.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ballan
52
Mount Egerton
2
Population
Ballan
3,392
Mount Egerton
706
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ballan | Mount Egerton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.0/100 | 49.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.5/100 | 44.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 87.1 / 1k | 41.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 6 |
| Walkability | 79.5/100 | 9.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 52 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 79 | 35 |
| Green cover | 8.1% | 12.4% |
| Population | 3,392 | 706 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Ballan is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Mount Egerton is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Ballan pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Mount Egerton is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Ballan generally means more approachable mid-market housing, while Mount Egerton leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Ballan suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Egerton is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.