Ballarat Central vs Mount Pleasant, VIC suburb comparison

Ballarat Central for retirees and investment; Mount Pleasant for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Ballarat CentralMount Pleasant

Overall score

Ballarat Central

69.1/100

Mount Pleasant

46.3/100

Crime rate

Ballarat Central

580.8 / 1k

Mount Pleasant

156.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ballarat Central

761

Mount Pleasant

42

Population

Ballarat Central

5,378

Mount Pleasant

2,225

Metric leadBallarat Central 6Mount Pleasant 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBallarat CentralMount Pleasant
Overall score69.1/10046.3/100
Housing (desirability)54.9/10076.0/100
Crime rate580.8 / 1k156.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools88
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops6312
Walkability100.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities76142
Planning activity23426
Population5,3782,225
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/103/10

Comparison summary

Ballarat Central is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Mount Pleasant is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Pleasant sits among greener hillside streets, while Ballarat Central keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Ballarat Central tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Mount Pleasant stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Ballarat Central generally means more mid-market housing value, while Mount Pleasant leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and investors may find Ballarat Central the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Pleasant.

Related comparisons