Launceston vs Ballarat Central suburb comparison (TAS vs VIC)

Launceston for retirees and families; Ballarat Central for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LauncestonBallarat Central

Overall score

Launceston

67.2/100

Ballarat Central

69.1/100

Crime rate

Launceston

2732.7 / 1k

Ballarat Central

580.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Launceston

790

Ballarat Central

761

Population

Launceston

3,110

Ballarat Central

5,378

Metric leadLaunceston 2Ballarat Central 52 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLauncestonBallarat Central
Overall score67.2/10069.1/100
Housing (desirability)26.0/10054.9/100
Crime rate2732.7 / 1k580.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools108
Parks & reserves6
Public transport stops4863
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities790761
Planning activity234
Population3,1105,378
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Launceston is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, whereas Ballarat Central is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Launceston pulls ahead on schools and education options and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Ballarat Central is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Launceston suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Ballarat Central is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons