Hobart vs Launceston, TAS Suburb Comparison

Hobart for investment and schools; Launceston for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HobartLaunceston

Overall score

Hobart

60.0/100

Launceston

59.3/100

Crime rate

Hobart

87.2 / 1k

Launceston

120.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hobart

1,022

Launceston

794

Population

Hobart

3,390

Launceston

3,110

Metric leadHobart 7Launceston 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHobartLaunceston
Overall score60.0/10059.3/100
Housing (desirability)26.2/10056.0/100
Crime rate87.2 / 1k120.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1010
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves106
Public transport stops5248
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities1,022794
Green cover2.9%4.6%
Population3,3903,110
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Hobart reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Launceston is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Hobart sits closer to the city centre, whereas Launceston is more regionally self-contained.

Hobart tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Launceston stands out for housing affordability and overall desirability. On housing, Hobart sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Launceston.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Launceston, while Hobart remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons