Hobart vs South Hobart, TAS Suburb Comparison

Hobart for retirees and families; South Hobart for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HobartSouth Hobart

Overall score

Hobart

60.0/100

South Hobart

49.1/100

Crime rate

Hobart

87.2 / 1k

South Hobart

87.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hobart

1,022

South Hobart

151

Population

Hobart

3,390

South Hobart

5,886

Metric leadHobart 5South Hobart 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHobartSouth Hobart
Overall score60.0/10049.1/100
Housing (desirability)26.2/10056.4/100
Crime rate87.2 / 1k87.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools101
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves103
Public transport stops5274
Walkability100.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities1,022151
Green cover2.9%23.8%
Population3,3905,886
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Hobart reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; South Hobart is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. South Hobart sits among greener hillside streets, while Hobart keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Hobart pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability, whereas South Hobart is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and a larger local community. On housing, Hobart sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in South Hobart.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Hobart the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer South Hobart.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons