Overall score
Bellerive
64.5/100
Hobart
60.0/100
Bellerive vs Hobart, TAS Suburb Comparison
Bellerive for investment and value; Hobart for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BelleriveHobart
Crime rate
Bellerive
55.5 / 1k
Hobart
87.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bellerive
172
Hobart
1,022
Population
Bellerive
4,945
Hobart
3,390
Metric leadBellerive 5Hobart 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bellerive | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.5/100 | 60.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.7/100 | 26.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.5 / 1k | 87.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 10 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 52 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 172 | 1,022 |
| Green cover | 9.5% | 2.9% |
| Population | 4,945 | 3,390 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Bellerive reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Hobart is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Bellerive pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Hobart is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Bellerive sits in a gently premium band, compared with a affordable feel in Hobart.
On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Bellerive, while Hobart remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.