Balnarring vs Merricks North, VIC Suburb Comparison

Balnarring for retirees and families; Merricks North for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BalnarringMerricks North

Overall score

Balnarring

47.9/100

Merricks North

49.5/100

Crime rate

Balnarring

50.1 / 1k

Merricks North

70.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Balnarring

23

Merricks North

7

Population

Balnarring

2,371

Merricks North

423

Metric leadBalnarring 5Merricks North 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBalnarringMerricks North
Overall score47.9/10049.5/100
Housing (desirability)36.7/10044.2/100
Crime rate50.1 / 1k70.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves91
Public transport stops5—
Walkability7.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities237
Planning activity6834
Green cover6.6%10.4%
Population2,371423
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Balnarring is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Merricks North is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Merricks North sits among greener hillside streets, while Balnarring keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Balnarring pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, whereas Merricks North is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Balnarring, while Merricks North remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons