Bankstown vs Mount Gambier Suburb Comparison (NSW vs SA)

Bankstown for schools; Mount Gambier for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BankstownMount Gambier

Overall score

Bankstown

41.8/100

Mount Gambier

51.5/100

Crime rate

Bankstown

115.1 / 1k

Mount Gambier

58.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bankstown

597

Mount Gambier

565

Population

Bankstown

34,933

Mount Gambier

25,591

Metric leadBankstown 5Mount Gambier 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBankstownMount Gambier
Overall score41.8/10051.5/100
Housing (desirability)22.9/10070.8/100
Crime rate115.1 / 1k58.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1920
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves26—
Public transport stops272121
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities597565
Planning activity54238
Green cover5.6%8.0%
Population34,93325,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Bankstown (NSW) is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Gambier (SA) is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Bankstown keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bankstown pulls ahead on public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mount Gambier is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. Bankstown generally means more sought-after housing, while Mount Gambier leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Bankstown if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Mount Gambier for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons