Bargo vs Pheasants Nest, NSW suburb comparison

Bargo for investment and value; Pheasants Nest for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BargoPheasants Nest

Overall score

Bargo

48.1/100

Pheasants Nest

39.1/100

Crime rate

Bargo

43.9 / 1k

Pheasants Nest

44.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bargo

44

Pheasants Nest

43

Population

Bargo

4,516

Pheasants Nest

716

Metric leadBargo 7Pheasants Nest 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBargoPheasants Nest
Overall score48.1/10039.1/100
Housing (desirability)63.2/10050.6/100
Crime rate43.9 / 1k44.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Public transport stops30884
Walkability59.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities4443
Planning activity3810
Population4,516716
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/108/10

Comparison summary

Bargo is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Pheasants Nest is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

On the data, Bargo is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Pheasants Nest answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Bargo suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Pheasants Nest is the stronger match for retirees.

Related comparisons