Baringa vs Little Mountain, QLD suburb comparison

Baringa for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BaringaLittle Mountain

Overall score

Baringa

56.0/100

Little Mountain

60.0/100

Crime rate

Baringa

27.5 / 1k

Little Mountain

27.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Baringa

76

Little Mountain

69

Population

Baringa

4,604

Little Mountain

11,068

Metric leadBaringa 4Little Mountain 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBaringaLittle Mountain
Overall score56.0/10060.0/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate27.5 / 1k27.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools32
Parks & reserves119
Public transport stops1222
Walkability47.0/10049.0/100
Nearby amenities7669
Population4,60411,068
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Baringa is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Little Mountain is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Little Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Baringa keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Baringa tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Little Mountain stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access.

Neither suburb has a sharp audience split here. The better choice between Baringa and Little Mountain comes down to which lifestyle trade-offs matter most to you.

Related comparisons