Barlows Hill vs Inverness, QLD Suburb Comparison

Barlows Hill for families and beach lifestyle; Inverness for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Barlows HillInverness

Overall score

Barlows Hill

36.4/100

Inverness

38.6/100

Crime rate

Barlows Hill

63.3 / 1k

Inverness

62.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Barlows Hill

0

Inverness

4

Population

Barlows Hill

834

Inverness

460

Metric leadBarlows Hill 3Inverness 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBarlows HillInverness
Overall score36.4/10038.6/100
Housing (desirability)37.4/10050.5/100
Crime rate63.3 / 1k62.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools32
Weather (desirability)18.0/10018.0/100
Parks & reserves—1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities04
Green cover38.2%25.2%
Population834460
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/109/10

Comparison summary

Barlows Hill is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, while Inverness is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Where Barlows Hill is shaped by the coast, Inverness offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Barlows Hill is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a larger local community; Inverness answers with housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability. On housing, Barlows Hill sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Inverness.

Barlows Hill suits families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Inverness is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons