Baulkham Hills vs Devonport suburb comparison (NSW vs TAS)

Baulkham Hills for retirees and families; Devonport for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Baulkham HillsDevonport

Overall score

Baulkham Hills

69.5/100

Devonport

71.3/100

Crime rate

Baulkham Hills

22.1 / 1k

Devonport

165.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Baulkham Hills

285

Devonport

321

Population

Baulkham Hills

37,415

Devonport

14,481

Metric leadBaulkham Hills 6Devonport 4across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBaulkham HillsDevonport
Overall score69.5/10071.3/100
Housing (desirability)42.3/10073.3/100
Crime rate22.1 / 1k165.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1210
Parks & reserves244
Public transport stops46073
Walkability84.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities285321
Planning activity66
Population37,41514,481
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Baulkham Hills is a hillside larger suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, whereas Devonport is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Baulkham Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Devonport keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Baulkham Hills is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Devonport answers with housing affordability and walkability. Baulkham Hills generally means more sought-after housing, while Devonport leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Baulkham Hills if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Devonport for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons