Baulkham Hills vs Devonport suburb comparison (NSW vs TAS)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Baulkham Hills | Devonport |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.6/100 | 72.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.3/100 | 73.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.8 / 1k | — |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 460 | 73 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 285 | 321 |
| Planning activity | 50 | — |
| Population | 37,415 | 14,481 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBaulkham Hills
- Best for familiesBaulkham Hills
- Best for investmentDevonport
- Best for best valueDevonport
- Best for best schoolsBaulkham Hills
Comparison summary
Across states, Baulkham Hills is a hillside larger suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, whereas Devonport is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Baulkham Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Devonport keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Baulkham Hills is stronger for schools and education options and parks and reserves; Devonport answers with housing affordability and walkability. Baulkham Hills generally means more sought-after housing, while Devonport leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Baulkham Hills if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Devonport for investors and value-focused buyers.